Frank Parker's author site

Home » British History » Monday Memories – Finding a Middle Way

Monday Memories – Finding a Middle Way

Translate

IASD Website

A great site for Indie authors

Archives

Download free preview

Blog Surfer

Advertisements
County Hall in Beverley. Now East Yorkshire, but, in the 1980s, the home of Humberside County Council. George Robinson [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)%5D

34 years on from my election to Humberside County Council, as one of four Liberals holding the balance of power, I cringe at my naivety. I recall being interviewed for the local TV. Asked what I hoped would be better about Humberside at the end of my four year term of office I struggled to come up with an answer and produced something pretty vague about giving people a bigger say in the decisions we took.

One certainty in politics is that everyone thinks they can do better than the current crop of politicians at all levels of government. That was certainly the belief I had on entering politics. It was not long before I came across a number of people who felt the same and found myself explaining that it is not as simple as it seems from what you read in the papers. Quite early on I invited a critic, someone who had written scathingly about the council in a letter to the Grimsby Telegraph, to accompany me on my next briefing session with the Director of Education so that he would have a better understanding of the kind of problems we had to grapple with. To his credit, that man wrote a second letter to the Grimsby Telegraph expressing his appreciation for what I had done.

We had access to the experience of Liberals on other councils where there was no party with an over all majority. These advised strongly that we should not seek alliances with either of the other two parties and this policy was endorsed nationally by the Liberal Party. We might be only 4 men, but together we represented about a quarter of all of the votes cast in the election; we had our own policy priorities, some of which were shared with Conservatives, some with Labour. We would need to consider each decision on its merits, not vote consistently with only one of the other parties.

This proved hard for the others to accept. They were used to a situation where the casting vote, if needed, was the Chairman’s – normally it would not be needed since each service committee would, like the council, have a majority of members from one party. For them this was a new and strange situation. We had to persuade the other parties that, for the next four years, committees would have equal numbers of Labour and Conservative members plus one Liberal; the committee’s chair person would not have a casting vote, the Liberal member would.

To begin with, Labour would not accept committee chairmanships on that basis, so we supported Conservative chairmen (they did not offer any women for these positions.) That lasted until the setting of the first annual budget early in 1986.

There is an endemic problem with the way local government is funded in the UK, one that is, if anything, worse now than it was in the 1980s. A mixture of government allocation and local property tax means that any reduction in the government allocation has to be met, either by a disproportionate amount raised locally, by cuts in services, or by charging for some services. Moreover, there are certain services the council has a statutory duty to provide and which cannot, therefore, be cut, which means that other services are particularly vulnerable to cuts and/or charges. Every such enforced decision – increasing taxes or charges, or cutting services – is bound to make the local politicians unpopular.

The education department, for example, was legally bound to provide education for children aged between 5 and 16 – and beyond for those able to benefit from continuing full time education. Adult education and provision for under 5s were therefore extremely vulnerable to any cuts in the education budget. Councillors on the political right were especially scornful of such provision. Still clinging to old fashioned notions about women’s roles, they believed that, should a mother choose to return to the workplace, she must pay for whatever provision was made for the care and education of her infants until they reached the statutory age for starting school. Likewise, adult education was regarded by the same individuals as a hobby activity which should not be tax-payer funded.

Similar arguments were used in the Social Services area with regard to the provision of home care services.

We were not prepared to support such policies and joined with Labour in voting down the budget proposed by the Conservatives, whereupon they resigned the chairmanships. Labour accepted the chairmanships (including one female) on our terms. That remained the position for the rest of the four year term.

Advertisements

5 Comments

  1. Sha'Tara says:

    Politics: the art of compromise. Side with the enemy in a common cause until he stabs you in the back!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. franklparker says:

    I think politics – and life in general – goes bad as soon as people start to think of others as enemies. That’s why our society, right across the so-called developed world is so broken right now.

    Like

    • Sha'Tara says:

      Sharp observation, and too true. Unfortunately politics is akin to religion, either you’re in or you’re the enemy, the traitor, the unbeliever. They are polarizing systems which will continue to rule and ruin until individuals decide they’ve had enough and learn to cooperate through compassion and self empowerment. My opinion, of course, but perhaps also my bit of observation and experience.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. franklparker says:

    Maybe that is a key difference between Europe and the UK and USA. Our systems (first past the post in single member constituencies) protect and embed bi-partisanship. Proportional Representation enables smaller parties and independent candidates to gain a foothold, forcing the larger parties to seek compromise and to recognise the size and nature of dissent among the electorate. Notwithstanding that, in my brief period of service, I found the majority of colleagues from both “camps” to be sincere people who cared about the welfare of the community we served. That is not to say there weren’t a few for whom personal agrandisement was the principle motivation.

    Like

  4. cat9984 says:

    Kudos to anyone who will work in local politics. As far as I can tell, when the process works no one notices, and when it doesn’t, everyone knows how to do it better.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Archives

Goodreads

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,197 other followers

%d bloggers like this: